I do enjoy statistics, but they have severe limitations as well. I mean, one could verify any theory depending on how they ask the question, study the data, the sample size. It is both extremely useful and extremely misleading.
I don't like the word pawn. It devalues something that has intrinsic necessity, and it makes it sound like people don't have a choice.
You are very specific on assumptions of gender, that my item is even alive, and that it has function beyond what only I could have use for it. That is a dangerous game, but I'll acknowledge your brilliance of details all the same.
You are an excellent chess player, aren't you?
[He's also smart enough and knows that House has been around enough to perhaps narrow down a list of people who could fit the asset category. Knowing this man's crass degrading attitude, it would be easy to flip a switch on the Soldier. Now wouldn't that be an interesting twist of events. Not for a public conversation unfortunately.]
no subject
I don't like the word pawn. It devalues something that has intrinsic necessity, and it makes it sound like people don't have a choice.
You are very specific on assumptions of gender, that my item is even alive, and that it has function beyond what only I could have use for it. That is a dangerous game, but I'll acknowledge your brilliance of details all the same.
You are an excellent chess player, aren't you?
[He's also smart enough and knows that House has been around enough to perhaps narrow down a list of people who could fit the asset category. Knowing this man's crass degrading attitude, it would be easy to flip a switch on the Soldier. Now wouldn't that be an interesting twist of events. Not for a public conversation unfortunately.]